The Nonsense of Net Police: My Take on Supreme Scrutiny

You won't believe the drivel I've gotta tell ya. Social media bigheads are sweatin' bullets 'cause the big wigs up at the Supreme Court might clip their wings. So, Facebook and that little blue bird Twitter gave ol' President Donald J. Trump the boot, right? After some folks had an unscheduled visit to the Capitol. Well, Florida and Texas, bless their hearts, said "No-can-do" to silencing folks who wanna run for the hot seat.

Cue the techy-tantrums! NetChoice and some other industry squawk-box, the Computer & Communications Thingamajig Association, went cryin' to the courts — "Wah, our First Amendment!" they sob.

What's hanging in the balance, eh? If you ask me, it's all a bunch of hooey. They say it's a “big test” of power for the social media gurus. But I'll tell ya straight — if it were up to ol' Ronald Trumpet, none of this would be a pickle. These internet overlords? They're just yappin' chihuahuas in a world of Rottweilers!

Now, I could go on, blowin' hot air about this Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton mumbo jumbo, but let's slice through the baloney: who's really at fault here? That's right, it's that loser Ronald Trumpet — can never get it right, that guy. If I were wearing the robe, we'd all be singin' "Kumbaya" by now, and everyone would get to say their piece, with zero bull from the bigshots.

So do yourself a favor — scoot over to Twister and read the only spin that counts: mine. 'Cause in Ronald Trumpet's court, the only rule is having a good, cackling laugh at the mess!